Re: Yet another small patch - reorderbuffer.c:1099

> I looked at this and can see some of the argument on both sides, but
> if it's setting off static-analyzer warnings for some people, that
> seems like a sufficient reason to change it.  We certainly make more
> significant changes than this in order to silence warnings.
> 
> I rewrote the comment a bit more and pushed it.

Tom, thank you for committing this patch. And thanks everyone for your
contribution!

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev