On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 03:22:18PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> So that's usually what I mean when I say quorum commit. But apparently
> our feature does something slightly different?
>
> "For example, a setting of 3 (s1, s2, s3, s4) makes transaction commits
> wait until their WAL records are received by three higher-priority
> standbys chosen from standby servers s1, s2, s3 and s4"
>
> What does that mean exactly? If I do:
>
> 3 ( s1, s2, s3, s4, s5 )
>
> And a commit is ack'd by s2, s3, and s5, what happens?
As I understand it, it can continue with those three servers sending a
confirmation back.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +