Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism
Дата
Msg-id 20160818001529.tpvrupsfe6gh5dvx@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2016-08-17 16:58:49 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > Could you also provide a strace -ttt -T -c and a cpu cycles flamegraph?
> 
> Here is the output from that strace invocation, plus a -p (to attach
> to the relevant backend):
> 
> strace: -t has no effect with -c
> strace: -T has no effect with -c

Ugh, swapped -c and -C, sorry.


> This doesn't seem that interesting, but not sure what you're looking for.

I'd like to know the amount of time spent in various syscalls, and how
much that varies.


> I also attach cycles flamegraph.

Thanks.

Andres



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch: initdb: "'" for QUOTE_PATH (non-windows)
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism