Re: Undocumented behavior od DROP SCHEMA ... CASCADE
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Undocumented behavior od DROP SCHEMA ... CASCADE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20160812222836.GA722084@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Undocumented behavior od DROP SCHEMA ... CASCADE ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Undocumented behavior od DROP SCHEMA ... CASCADE
|
| Список | pgsql-docs |
David G. Johnston wrote: > If we are looking to improve things here I'd at least consider having the > default cascade to be safe and not drop persisted data (I suppose that > could functions linked to functional indexes...) and have a separate flag > that would also be permitted to destroy data. Having such a dependency > listing query distinguish between data-loss and other would be a good > intermediate step. Well, if you happen to drop a view for which you no longer have the definition, you may be similarly screwed. I prefer the approach that we consider all drops as potentially dangerous. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: