Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE)
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20160804003402.GE1702@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 01:16:20AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > > Would you only add a LITE index entry when there isn't an > > existing index entry for the same values and heap page? That seems > > quite complicated. > > The insertion algorithm is described. Doesn't seem complicated to me. Ah, I see it now: As UPDATEs occur we request inserts into the index. If a lossy indexpointer already exists that covers the new linepointerthen we skipthe index insert, optimizing writes to the index. I thought you meant "already exists" just means it matches the existing range. I was unclear that was the entire page. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: