On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:20:27AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Perhaps a nitpick, but in subsection 51.3.1 in the "Error Message Style Guide"
> the language in the rationale for avoiding implementation details seems to not
> be in line with the overall one of voice of the docs. ISTM the following reads
> better:
>
> - don't know the details anyway.
> + aren't expected to know the details.
>
> Patch attached.
Thanks, patch applied.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +