Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Although this is in principle a bug fix, it's invasive enough that I'd
> > be pretty hesitant to back-patch it, or even to stick it into HEAD
> > post-beta. I'm inclined to sign it up for the next commitfest instead.
>
> Do we have a backpatchable fix for the reported problem? If so, then it
> seems a good tradeoff to install this more invasive fix in HEAD only and
> apply the simpler fix to back branches. Otherwise, is the proposal to
> leave the bug unfixed in back branches?
I meant "install in HEAD only, after the 10.0 branch", which is what you
proposed.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services