Re: dumping database privileges broken in 9.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: dumping database privileges broken in 9.6
Дата
Msg-id 20160720141946.GE4028@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: dumping database privileges broken in 9.6  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
* Noah Misch (noah@leadboat.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:46:17PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Noah Misch (noah@leadboat.com) wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 12:55:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > > * Noah Misch (noah@leadboat.com) wrote:
> > > > > This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send
> > > > > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> > > > > update.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately, not going to make any further progress on this tonight or
> > > > over the weekend as I'm going to be out of town.  I believe I've
> > > > convinced myself that adding a template1 entry to pg_init_privs will be
> > > > both sufficient and produce the correct results, along with adjusting
> > > > the query in pg_dumpall to join through it.  Will provide an update on
> > > > Monday.
> > >
> > > This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is long past due for your status update.  Kindly
> > > send a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent
> > > status update.  (Your Tuesday posting lacked a date.)
> >
> > Yeah, I realized that tablespaces have the same issue and have updated
> > the patch to address them as well, in the same way.
> >
> > Going through and doing testing now.  Unfortunately, it doesn't look
> > like adding in testing of tablespaces into the TAP tests would be very
> > easy (the only TAP test that deals with tablespaces that I found was
> > pg_basebackup and that looks rather grotty..), so I'm not planning to do
> > that, at least not at this time.
> >
> > As such, I'm planning to commit the patch with the fix+regression test
> > for database ACLs and the fix for tablespace ACLs either later today
> > or tomorrow.
>
> Does commit 47f5bb9 fully fix this open item?

Yes, I've updated the open items wiki.

Thanks!

Stephen

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Oddity in handling of cached plans for FDW queries
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Oddity in handling of cached plans for FDW queries