* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > I agree with removing the source code field, though I did like the
> > suggestion mentioned elsewhere for having it shown when it's just a C
> > symbol but not otherwise. If we can find a way to have the C symbol
> > shown when it's a C or internal function, I'm fine with that, but the
> > source code field having entier pl/sql and pl/pgsql functions in it
> > doesn't work and \sf should be used instead.
>
> It would certainly be easy enough to do that, as long as you don't mind
> hard-wiring into psql the knowledge that "internal" and "C" are the
> languages to show prosrc for. "Source code" would no longer be a very
> appropriate column name, though it already was not for these cases.
> I'd be inclined to call it "Internal name" instead.
That would certainly work for me.
Thanks!
Stephen