Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver

Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have one question; why do we call the column "conn_info" instead of
> > "conninfo" which is basically used in other places? "conninfo" is better to me.
> 
> No real reason for one or the other to be honest. If you want to
> change it you could just apply the attached.

I was of two minds myself, and found no reason to change conn_info, so I
decided to keep what was submitted.  If you want to change it, I'm not
opposed.

Don't forget to bump catversion.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services