On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 09:00:45AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >>> This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> >>> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> >>> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> >>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com
> >>
> >> IIRC Kevin is out of the office this week, so this'll have to wait till
> >> next week.
> >
> > No, he's back since Tuesday - it was last week that he was out. I
> > spoke with him yesterday about this and he indicated that he had been
> > thinking about it and had several ideas about how to fix it. I'm not
> > sure why he hasn't posted here yet.
>
> I have been looking at several possible fixes, and weighing the
> pros and cons of each. I expect to post a patch later today.
This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com