Re: Parallelized polymorphic aggs, and aggtype vs aggoutputtype

Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:

> > I think we should break up internal into various kinds of internal
> > depending on what kind of a thing we've actually got a pointer to.
> 
> Not a bad long-term project, but it's not happening in this cycle.
> I'm not very sure how we'd go about it anyway --- for examples
> like this, every new user-defined aggregate potentially wants its
> own flavor of "internal", so how do we manage that?

Can't we have them be ExtensibleNode?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services