Re: Is the unfair lwlock behavior intended?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Is the unfair lwlock behavior intended?
Дата
Msg-id 20160525192644.tgep4offdk5fcu75@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Is the unfair lwlock behavior intended?  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Hi,

On 2016-05-24 06:03:07 +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> At that time, many backend processes (I forgot the number) were acquiring and releasing share mode lock on
ProcArrayLock,most of which were from TransactionIsInProgress().
 

FWIW, I suspect that 9.6 might be a fair bit better here, due to
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=8a7d0701814a4e293efad22091d6f6fb441bbe1c

Regards,

Andres

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is the unfair lwlock behavior intended?
Следующее
От: Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PROPOSAL] Move all am-related reloption code into src/backend/access/[am-name] and get rid of relopt_kind