Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich@gmx.de> wrote:
> >> Amit Kapila writes:
> >>> Sounds good. So can we assume that you will try to get us the new report
> >>> with more information?
> >
> > I don't see these crashes anymore in c1543a8. By the amount of fuzzing
> > done it should have happened a dozen times, so it's highly likely
> > something in 23b09e15..c1543a8 fixed it.
>
> Hmm, I'd guess c45bf5751b6338488bd79ce777210285531da373 to be the most
> likely candidate.
I thought so too, but then that patch change things in the planner side,
but it seems to me that the reported crash is in the executor, unless I'm
misreading.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services