On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 07:21:21AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-05-02 09:03:19 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Now to continue with the performance benchmarks. I'm pretty sure
> > > we've fixed the problems when the feature is disabled
> > > (old_snapshot_threshold = -1), and there are several suggestions
> > > for improving performance while it is on that need to be compared
> > > and benchmarked.
> >
> > If anyone thinks that the issue with the feature disabled is NOT
> > fixed, please speak up! I'm moving the corresponding open item to
> > CLOSE_WAIT status, meaning that it will be closed if nobody shows up
> > to say that there is still an issue.
>
> Well, I don't agree that the feature is in a releaseable state. The
> datastructure is pretty much non-scalable, and maintained on the wrong
> side (every read, instead of once in writing writing xacts). There's no
> proposal actually addressing the scalability issues.
I also strongly question whether we should revert this feature and try
again in 9.7.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +