Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Дата
Msg-id 20160429021220.GA30154@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:07:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Are we going to rename pg_xlog or pg_clog for 9.6?
> 
> NO.  We don't even have a patch for this, much less one that's been
> through any review.  This suggestion is at least two months too late.

My larger question was, was 9.6 an ideal time to do this, and if so, why
did this issue not get done.  If 9.6 wasn't in some way ideal, we can do
it in 9.7.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+                     Ancient Roman grave inscription +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgres 9.6 scariest patch tournament
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [sqlsmith] Crash in apply_projection_to_path