Re: Parser extensions (maybe for 10?)
От | Aleksander Alekseev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parser extensions (maybe for 10?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160419122003.731704b2@fujitsu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parser extensions (maybe for 10?) (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parser extensions (maybe for 10?)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> no - it is not possible. Not with Bison parser - it cannot work with > unknown syntax - so isn't possible implement one part by parser A, and > second part by parser B. > > But we can parsers P1 and P2. P1 knows string XX, P2 knows YY. Buildin > parser (BP) knows SQL > > We can have registered parsers P1, P2, BP. > > for string SELECT > > P1 fails, > P2 fails, > BP processes it > > for string YY > > P1 fails, > P2 process it, > BP is not called > > But transformations can be allowed too (but it is slower) > > for string ZZZZ > > P1 does transformation to YYY > P2 does transformation to SELECT > BP processes it I look on this a little bit differently. Current pipeline is approximately like this: ``` query string -> LEX -> [lexemes] -> SYNT -> QueryAST -> PLANNER ``` Or in Haskell-like notation: ``` lex :: String -> [Lexeme] synt :: [Lexeme] -> AST ``` Its reasonably simple to extend a lexer. Lets say that AST type doesn't change, i.e. extensions provide only syntax sugar. After desugaring query transforms to old-good SELECT, UPDATE, procedures calls, etc. In this case what extension does is actually: ``` type Parser = [Lexeme] -> AST extendParser :: Parser -> Parser ``` Can we guarantee that extensions don't conflict? In fact we can since we already do it. If all tests pass there is no conflict. The only tricky part I see is that sometimes we want: ``` extendParser1 ( extendParser2 ( default )) ``` ... and sometimes: ``` extendParser2 ( extendParser1 ( default )) ``` I don't think that order of extension will matter most of the time. But we still should provide a mechanism to change this order. For instance, contribs could provide a default priority of parser extension. Extensions with higher priority are applied first. Also user can resolve conflicts by manually overriding these priorities: ``` select pg_parser_extension_priorities(); select pg_override_parser_extension_priority('some_extension', 100500); ``` I think it should work. Thought? -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev http://eax.me/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: