Re: parallel query vs extensions

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:56:28AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Should every relevant contrib extension get a version bump with a
> > transition file which is nothing but a list of "alter function blah
> > blah blah parallel safe" ?
> 
> Yes, I think that's what we would need to do.  It's a lot of work,
> albeit mostly mechanical.

This is in the open items list, but I think it is too late to include such a
change in 9.6.  This is an opportunity for further optimization, not a defect.