On 2016-04-13 11:20:19 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-04-13 14:16:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Good point, it would be absolutely duplicative. What I'd suggest,
> > actually, is that we convert this to the same info as what elog
> > provides (file+line+function name).
>
> Heh, I was wondering the same aftering sending the last email. Will do
> that then.
Pushed. Let's see what pademelon says...