Re: snapshot too old, configured by time
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: snapshot too old, configured by time |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20160401144518.GA15568@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: snapshot too old, configured by time (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: snapshot too old, configured by time
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote: > Attached is what I think you're talking about for the first patch. > AFAICS this should generate identical executable code to unpatched. > Then the patch to actually implement the feature would, instead > of adding 30-some lines with TestForOldSnapshot() would implement > that as the behavior for the other enum value, and alter those > 30-some BufferGetPage() calls. > > Álvaro and Michael, is this what you were looking for? Yes, this is what I was thinking, thanks. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: