Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >Well, I noticed that the docs talk about an operator that can be used in
> >SQL (outside the tsquery parser), as well as an operator that can be
> Just to join 2 tsquery with operator FOLLOWED BY
Ok.
> >used inside tsquery. Inside tsquery anything would be usable, but
> >outside that it would be good to keep in mind the rest of SQL operators;
> >and <> means "different from", so using it for FOLLOWED BY seems odd to
> >me.
> previous rule was: duplicate operation character to join tsqueries.
> Ellipsis is forbidden to use as operator name:
> # create operator ... (procedure = 'int2and');
> ERROR: syntax error at or near ".."
> LINE 1: create operator ... (procedure = 'int2and');
> What is your suggestion for joining operator name?
Silly me ... The dot is not allowed in operator names :-( Sorry. If
there was a character that was very similar to dots I would suggest
that. The closest is * I think, so what do you think of "***"?
> >My suggestion of ... (ellipsis) is because that's already known as
> >related to text, used for omissions of words, where the surrounding
> >words form a phrase. It seems much more natural to me.
> Yes, agree for omission. But for reason above its'n a good name although I
> don't have a strong objections.
>
> may be <=>? it isn't used anywhere yet.
>
> select 'fat'::tsquery <=> 'cat';
> select 'fat <=> cat'::tsquery;
> select 'fat <3> cat'::tsqyery; -- for non-default distance.
Dunno. That looks pretty "relationalish".
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services