Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
От | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160325225206.69661a97@firost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 (Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Le Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:41:35 +0300, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Peter Geoghegan < > peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > > > It's important to remember that PR strategy and engineering truth have > > > only a passing acquaintance. While we don't want to promote vaporware, > > > we do sometimes soft-pedal our own features to our project's detriment. > > > In the current atomosphere of VC-funded hype, we'd do a bit better to > > > trumpet our accomplishements early and often. > > > > I see what you mean. > > > > The question must be asked: What feature *would* meet that "major > > version bump" standard? If it's not extensive parallelism, then I > > don't know what else it could be. > > > > Built-in HA Cluster. Hope to discuss it on PGCon. I thought about release > 10 in the context of cluster. I would say "better HA cluster". Good HA is really challenging and rely on many moving parts or outside technologies from the architecture. I don't know what you might mean by "Built-in". Funny, I was joking with a colleague about that today: «Really, the features that deserves the 10.0 version are GUC-ing the recovery.conf and supports online-demote» Regards, -- Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais Dalibo
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: