Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'

At 2016-03-21 12:04:40 +0530, ams@2ndQuadrant.com wrote:
>
> I'll write up a patch for this. Thanks for the suggestions.

Here's a patch to implement ALTER FUNCTION x DEPENDS ON EXTENSION y.

The changes to functioncmds.c:AlterFunction were less intrusive than I
had originally feared.

-- Abhijit