Re: Relaxing SSL key permission checks
| От | Christoph Berg |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Relaxing SSL key permission checks |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20160219115334.GB26862@msg.df7cb.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Relaxing SSL key permission checks (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Relaxing SSL key permission checks
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Tom Lane 2016-02-18 <27423.1455809676@sss.pgh.pa.us> > I did have a thought though: could we allow two distinct permissions > configurations? That is, allow either: > > * file is owned by us, mode 0600 or less > > * file is owned by root, mode 0640 or less > > The first case is what we allow today. (We don't need an explicit > ownership check; if the mode is 0600 and we can read it, we must be > the owner.) The second case is what Debian wants. We already know > we are not root, so if we can read the file, we must be part of the > group that root has allowed to read the file, and at that point it's > on root's head whether or not that group is secure. I don't have a > problem with trusting root's judgment on security matters --- if the > root admin is incompetent, there are probably holes everywhere anyway. Makes sense to me. > The problem with the proposed patch is that it's conflating these > distinct cases, but that's easily fixed. Updated patch attached. Christoph -- cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: