On 2016-02-11 13:37:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > And anyway, these macros are a potential issue even without stdbool.h
> > style booleans.
>
> Absolutely; they don't work safely for testing bits that aren't in the
> rightmost byte of a flag word, for instance. I'm on board with making
> these fixes, I'm just unconvinced that stdbool is a good reason for it.
Oh, ok. Interactions with stdbool was what made me looking into this,
that's primarily why I mentioned it. What's your thinking about
back-patching, independent of that then?