Re: Segfault in MemoryContextAlloc
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Segfault in MemoryContextAlloc |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20160127103533.GA17919@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Segfault in MemoryContextAlloc (Dmitriy Sarafannikov <dimon99901@mail.ru>) |
| Ответы |
Re[2]: [BUGS] Segfault in MemoryContextAlloc
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
On 2016-01-27 13:24:35 +0300, Dmitriy Sarafannikov wrote:
> Hi, i caught segfault with a simple select query (column and table names in query were changed).
> select id_pk2 from table1 where id_pk1 = '9751302'
>
> primary key is (id_pk1, id_pk2)
> table1 is (id_pk1 bigint, id_pk2 bigint, date_add timestamp)
> (gdb) bt full
> #0 MemoryContextAlloc (context=0x0, size=120) at
/build/postgresql-9.4-MZhK6O/postgresql-9.4-9.4.5/build/../src/backend/utils/mmgr/mcxt.c:584
> No locals.
> #1 0x00007f6ecc5b8eec in AfterTriggerBeginXact () at
/build/postgresql-9.4-MZhK6O/postgresql-9.4-9.4.5/build/../src/backend/commands/trigger.c:3913
> No locals.
> #2 0x00007f6ecc4e8c21 in StartTransaction () at
/build/postgresql-9.4-MZhK6O/postgresql-9.4-9.4.5/build/../src/backend/access/transam/xact.c:1848
> s = 0x7f6eccbc4480 <TopTransactionStateData>
> #3 StartTransactionCommand () at
/build/postgresql-9.4-MZhK6O/postgresql-9.4-9.4.5/build/../src/backend/access/transam/xact.c:2534
> s = 0x7f6eccbc4480 <TopTransactionStateData>
> __func__ = "StartTransactionCommand"
That's, uh, weird. TopTransactionContext should never be NULL here. This
is with a stock 9.4.5, without any further extensions configured?
My best guess is that some cache invalidation callback did something
invalid. With
AtStart_Inval();
AtStart_Cache();
AfterTriggerBeginXact();
in StartTransaction(), AtStart_Inval() still had a valid
TopTransactionContext, but AfterTriggerBeginXact() didn't anymore, that
seems like a good guess.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: