Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
Дата
Msg-id 20160114171421.GK10941@awork2.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2016-01-14 12:07:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Do we want to provide a backward compatible API for all this? I'm fine
> > either way.
>
> How would that work?

I'm thinking of something like;

int WaitOnLatchSet(LatchEventSet *set, int wakeEvents, long timeout);

int
WaitLatchOrSocket(volatile Latch *latch, int wakeEvents, pgsocket sock,long timeout)
{       LatchEventSet set;
       LatchEventSetInit(&set, latch);
       if (sock != PGINVALID_SOCKET)          LatchEventSetAddSock(&set, sock);
       return WaitOnLatchSet(set, wakeEvents, timeout);
}

I think we'll need to continue having wakeEvents and timeout parameters
for WaitOnLatchSet, we quite frequently want to wait socket
readability/writability, not wait on the socket, or have/not have
timeouts.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Marko Tiikkaja
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SET syntax in INSERT
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794