Re: unused_oids?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: unused_oids? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20152.1169741772@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | unused_oids? (Gevik Babakhani <pgdev@xs4all.nl>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gevik Babakhani <pgdev@xs4all.nl> writes:
> At this moment the following is the list of the unused OIDs. For the
> uuid datatype I use a script for generating catalog entries. I can close
> some gaps there if the "masters" are okay with this. Are any OIDs
> reserved for later or any range can be used in this case?
My advice is not to try to fill in the gaps --- better to leave them
there so that if any other objects are created that're related to the
nearby ones, they can be assigned nearby OIDs. If you've got a patch
that is going to use a bunch of OIDs for related purposes, it's better
to use a contiguous chunk of OIDs for it.
I believe that the bitmap-indexing patch is using OIDs starting at 3000
(at least that's the advice I gave them awhile back). If you need less
than 50 you might start at 2950, else check that patch and start above
whatever they used.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: