Re: commit 5c45d2f need to be back-patch on branch 9.2 & before

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: commit 5c45d2f need to be back-patch on branch 9.2 & before
Дата
Msg-id 20151229114226.x33xobhuve443w6i@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на commit 5c45d2f need to be back-patch on branch 9.2 & before  (amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Hi,

On 2015-12-29 11:22:52 +0000, amul sul wrote:
> Uninitialized variable 'dtype' warning in date_in() is fix[1] on branch 9.3 & above, but not for 9.2 & older
branches.I guess this should be back-patch. 
 
> [1] commit link=> http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/5c45d2f87835ccd3ffac338845ec79cab1b31a11

We don't routinely backpatch warnings. Often enough the benefit is not
worth the risk. In this case I'd possibly gone the other way, but given
it's a low frequency warning in old branches I'm not inclined to do so
today.

Andres

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: amul sul
Дата:
Сообщение: commit 5c45d2f need to be back-patch on branch 9.2 & before
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_controldata/pg_resetxlog "Latest checkpoint's NextXID" format