Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 03:21:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > Backpatching seems fine to me. I was just concerned if anyone was
> > > relying on the existing buggy behavior.
> >
> > Seems unlikely. Even if they are, the potential for catalog corruption
> > later seems to trump that argument.
> >
> > > We do list this item as a 9.5
> > > incompatibility, so the question is whether we can add an
> > > incompatibility to back branches:
> >
> > > Fix <link linkend="SQL-REASSIGN-OWNED"><command>REASSIGN OWNED</></>
> > > and <link linkend="SQL-ALTERTYPE"><command>ALTER OWNER TO</></>
> > > to properly update permissions lists (ACLs) when changing ownership of
> > > types, foreign data wrappers, and foreign servers (Bruce Momjian)
> >
> > Actually, I guess we should take out that 9.5 release note item altogether
> > if we back-patch this.
>
> Yes, that was one of my points.
Backpatched all the way back to 9.1. Are you, Bruce, on the hook for
removing the 9.5 release note entry, or should I do that?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services