Re: Fwd: Cluster "stuck" in "not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Fwd: Cluster "stuck" in "not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss"
Дата
Msg-id 20151217171415.GB5910@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Fwd: Cluster "stuck" in "not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss"  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Fwd: Cluster "stuck" in "not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss"  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 2015-12-17 09:04:25 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > But I'm somewhat confused what this has to do with Andres's report.
> 
> Doesn't it explain the exact situation he is in, where the oldest
> database is 200 million, but the cluster as a whole is 2 billion?

There were no crashes, so no, I don't think so.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Let PostgreSQL's On Schedule checkpoint write buffer smooth spread cycle by tuning IsCheckpointOnSchedule?
Следующее
От: Corey Huinker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should TIDs be typbyval = FLOAT8PASSBYVAL to speed up CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY?