Re: Fixing warnings in back branches?

On 2015-12-15 08:53:25 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> So... that means we can't really get rid of these warnings on 9.1,
> IIUC.

Well, we could fix them. Or, as proposed here, just silence that
category.


> I agree it would be nice to do if this were no issue, but as it
> is I'm inclined to think we should just live with it for the next ~10
> months.  After that 9.1 will no longer be a supported branch.

I think that's an ok one-off policy. But looking back it was pretty much
always the case that the release -3 or so started to look pretty
horrible, warning wise.

Andres