Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data.
| От | Andrew Sullivan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20151118213401.GZ30327@crankycanuck.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing
dead tuples with sensitive data.
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:22:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > It's quite unclear to me what threat model such a behavior would add > useful protection against. If you had some sort of high-security database and deleted some data from it, it's important for the threat modeller to know whether the data is gone-as-in-overwritten or gone-as-in-marked-free. This is the same reason they want to know whether a deleted file is actually just unlinked on the disk. This doesn't mean one thing is better than another; just that, if you're trying to understand what data could possibly be exfiltrated, you need to know the state of all of it. For realistic cases, I expect that deleted data is usually more important than updated data. But a threat modeller needs to understand all these variables anyway. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@crankycanuck.ca
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: