Re: quieting DEBUG3

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: quieting DEBUG3
Дата
Msg-id 20151028191023.GA5726@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: quieting DEBUG3  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: quieting DEBUG3  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:

> Another point I want to reiterate - because nobody seems to be
> addressing it - is that some of these messages are totally useless.  I
> grant that printing the transaction state (XIDs, CIDs, etc.) is
> useful.  But does anybody really think that it's useful for every
> statement to *additionally* generate DEBUG:  CommitTransactionCommand?
>  Who looks at that?  What value does it have?  We do not print a
> message when any other function that is called for every query is
> entered - why that one?

No, it is useless, let's get rid of it.  Maybe it was a useful debugging
tool when postgres.c was being developed, but it's not useful now and
instead very bothersome.

> Whether we adjust the log levels of the messages we have or not, we
> surely ought to get rid of the ones that are useless clutter.

Agreed.  I liked your proposal for reduction of transaction state
printout to a single, denser line.

> Can anyone think of a single instance in which that particular message
> has been useful in debugging ... anything?

Not I.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Muthiah Rajan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Disabling START TRANSACTION for a SuperUser
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is there any ordering to the values in guc.c?