Oleksii Kliukin wrote:
> Thank you, now it’s clear. I have to say there is no guarantee that
> the computation would be useless. Someone might be calling a function
> that updates/deletes rows in the SELECT INTO block, being forced to
> use SELECT INTO by inability of pl/pgSQL to just discard the result of
> a normal SELECT. I know one can use a loop or call PERFORM, but in
> some cases (a complex CTE computing the data for the function being
> called at the end, which updates the tables with this data) actually
> using SELECT INTO looks like the easiest path to achieve the desired
> result.
So this whole issue is just because it is not possible to use PERFORM
alongside WITH?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services