Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20151.1577127467@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 23:49 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Oh, interesting --- I hadn't been paying much attention to that thread.
>> I'll compare your PoC there to what I did.
> Actually, I should’ve said that your patch is much better attempt at
> getting this in order, so there’s not much to see in my patch really. :)
One thing I see is that you chose to relocate RelationGetPartitionDesc's
declaration to partdesc.h, whereupon RelationBuildPartitionDesc doesn't
have to be exported at all anymore. Perhaps that's a better factorization
than what I did. It supposes that any caller of RelationGetPartitionDesc
is going to need partdesc.h, but that seems reasonable. We could likewise
move RelationGetPartitionKey to partcache.h.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: