Tom, all,
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> My vote would be to rename and reposition the field in HEAD and 9.5
> and accept the corresponding initdb. We already forced an initdb
> since alpha2, so it's basically free as far as testers are concerned,
> and keeping 9.5 in sync with HEAD in this area seems like a really
> good idea for awhile to come.
Alright, attached is an attempt at doing these renames. I went a bit
farther since it seemed to make sense to me (at least at the time, I'm
wondering a bit about it now), so, please provide any thoughts or
feedback you have regarding these changes.
Thanks!
Stephen