Re: Is this a bug?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Is this a bug?
Дата
Msg-id 20150903185216.GF2912@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Is this a bug?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Is this a bug?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> >
> >> Why this patch was reverted one day after applied [1]? I didn't see any
> >> discussion around it.
> >
> > Contributors whose patches are getting committed should really subscribe
> > to pgsql-committers.
> 
> I would have thought discussion of committed patches should be moved
> to -hackers.

I agree, but it happens anyway quite frequently.  Since recently, I make
a point of changing the CC from -committers to -hackers, but due to
force of habit I often forget.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PROPOSAL] Inputs on forcing VACUUM VERBOSE to write timestamp
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: PG_CATCH used without PG_RETHROW