> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> So apparently, the
>> CJK to Unicode mappings are still evolving and should be updated
>> occasionally. Next steps would be to commit some or all of these
>> differences after additional verification, and then update the scripts
>> to use whatever the non-obsolete mapping sources are supposed to be.
>
> Would that pose a problem for databases which have data in them
> already using the old mappings?
I think so. We must be very careful updating the maps. Adding new
mapping data would cause less problem, but replacing existing mappings
will be definitely a big problem for users.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp