Re: Outdated note about unique indexes

On Wed, Jul  8, 2015 at 03:10:46PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > That note has been there forever, in particular since before we
> > supported CONCURRENTLY, which is pretty darn important in many uses
> > nowadays. Since it seems like some users have taken this suggestion
> > seriously, e.g. on stackoverflow[1], how about we remove this outdated
> > suggestion? There is already a previous mention a few sections
> > earlier[2] suggesting the use of CONCURRENTLY, so I don't think we
> > really need to reiterate that suggestion here.
>
> +1

Patch applied through 9.5.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +