* Joe Conway (mail@joeconway.com) wrote:
> On 08/26/2015 06:33 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Joe Conway (mail@joeconway.com) wrote:
> >> Issues needing comment: a.) Which items need hiding from
> >> non-superusers and should the value be redacted or the entire
> >> result set row be suppressed?
> >
> > I'm of the opinion that we need to at least redact it and that what
> > we should do is simply suppress the entire result set until we
> > provide a way for administrators to manage who can access it (eg:
> > default roles, this one would fall under 'pg_monitor', imo).
>
> Whatever it is it would have to be available during initdb. And in any
> case I'm no closer to knowing which rows to hide/redact/suppress other
> than WAL position. Possibly the thing to do for now would be to revoke
> public from these?
That was my thinking- revoke public from them. The default roles, based
on the last patch anyway, are available at initdb time and when
system_views.sql is run.
Thanks!
Stehpen