Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Дата
Msg-id 20150715112504.GJ2301@postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:

> JSON seems the most sensible format for the string. Inventing a new one
> doesn't make sense. Most important for me is the ability to
> programmatically manipulate/edit the config string, which would be harder
> with a new custom format.

Do we need to keep the value consistent across all the servers in the
flock?  If not, is the behavior halfway sane upon failover?

If we need the DBA to keep the value in sync manually, that's going to
be a recipe for trouble.  Which is going to bite particularly hard
during those stressing moments when disaster strikes and things have to
be done in emergency mode.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2