The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 13458
Logged by: Greg Burek
Email address: gregburek@heroku.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.4.2
Operating system: Linux
Description:
Hello,
The same customer as in bug #13457 has found that a postgres_fdw user
mapping dictates that pg_dump --no-acl --no-owner will reference the owner
of the dumped db and will produce an error during pg_restore --no-acl
--no-owner to a db without a matching previous user.
Reproduction schema:
CREATE SERVER redshift_dw FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER postgres_fdw OPTIONS (
dbname 'reporting',
host 'example.com',
port '5439',
sslmode 'require'
);
ALTER SERVER redshift_dw OWNER TO u5cuus46hhtdfs;
CREATE USER MAPPING FOR u5cuus46hhtdfs SERVER redshift_dw OPTIONS (
password '',
"user" 'user'
);
A pg_dump --no-acl --no-owner will reference the user:
--
-- TOC entry 4313 (class 0 OID 0)
-- Dependencies: 2216
-- Name: USER MAPPING u5cuus46hhtdfs SERVER redshift_dw; Type: USER MAPPING;
Schema: -; Owner: -
--
CREATE USER MAPPING FOR u5cuus46hhtdfs SERVER redshift_dw OPTIONS (
And a pg_restore --no-acl --no-owner will fail on this line as pg_restore is
using a different user:
pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 4491; 0 0 USER MAPPING USER
MAPPING u5cuus46hhtdfs SERVER redshift_dw u5cuus46hhtdfs
pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: role
"u5cuus46hhtdfs" does not exist
Command was: CREATE USER MAPPING FOR u5cuus46hhtdfs SERVER redshift_dw
OPTIONS (
Should the schema user mapping output by pg_dump --no-owner preserve the
previous owner, as it does above, or is there a way to make the user mapping
mutable during a dump and restore so that it may be restored to an arbitrary
user?
User worked around the issue by dropping the fdw before performing a dump
and restore upgrade.
Greg