Re: [HACKERS] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> I see another hole in this area.  See do_start_worker() -- there we only
> consider the offsets limit to determine a database to be in
> almost-wrapped-around state (causing emergency attention).  If the
> database in members trouble has no pgstat entry, it might get completely
> ignored.

For the record -- it was pointed out to me that this was actually fixed
by 53bb309d2.  \o/

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services