Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode
От | David Gould |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150608160221.437fb596@engels обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 13:03:56 -0300 Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ohmygosh, you have to rpm install a bunch of -devel stuff? What a massive > > hardship. > > It's not about the 5 minutes of compile time, it's about the signalling. > > Just *when* is git ready for testing? You don't know from the outside. > > I do lurk here a lot and still am unsure quite often. > > Even simply releasing an alpha *tarball* would be useful enough. What > is needed is the signal to test, rather than a fully-built package. This. The clients I referred to earlier don't even use the rpm packages, they build from sources. They need to know when it is worthwhile to take a new set of sources and test. Some sort of labeling about what the contents are would enable them to do this. I don't think a monthly snapshot would work as well as the requirement is knowing that "grouping sets are in" not that "it is July now". -dg -- David Gould daveg@sonic.net If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: