Andres Freund wrote:
> Alternatively we could make MultiXactIdIsRunning() return false < 9.3
> when in recovery. I think that'd end up fixing things, but it seems
> awfully fragile to me.
Hm, why fragile? It seems a pretty decent answer -- pre-9.3, it's not
possible for a tuple to be "locked" in recovery, is it? I mean, in the
standby you can't lock it nor update it; the only thing you can do is
read (select), and that is not affected by whether there is a multixact
in it.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services