On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:23:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:10:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >>> Is there a reason the following patch wasn't applied?
>
> >> I don't think anybody ever did the legwork to verify it was a good idea.
> >> In particular, it'd be good to check if sending a tabstat message for each
> >> table adds noticeable overhead.
>
> > OK, I will mark it as closed then. Thanks.
>
> I don't know that it should be closed exactly --- if we don't do this,
> we should do something else about the performance issue. Maybe put it
> on TODO?
Thanks, TODO added:
Reduce memory use when analyzing many tables
(This is part of my clean up of old issues in preparation for 9.5
feature freeze.)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +