Re: pgbench -f and vacuum

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> It's says:
>
> starting vacuum.... ERROR: blah
> ERROR: blah
> ERROR: blah
> done
>
> And then continues on.  Sure, that's not the greatest error reporting
> output ever, but what do you expect from pgbench?  I think it's clear
> enough what's going on there.  The messages appear in quick
> succession, because it doesn't take very long to notice that the table
> isn't there, so it's not like you are sitting there going "wait,
> what?".
>
> If we're going to add something, I like your second suggestion
> "(ignoring this error and continuing anyway)" more than the first one.
> Putting "ignoring:" before the thing you plan to ignore will be
> confusing, I think.

+1 to adding "(ignoring this error and continuing anyway)" and
committing this.
Thanks!
    Stephen