On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:03:01AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >> Andrew did the research to support a higher value, but even 10 should
> >> be an improvement over what we have now.
> >
> > Yes, I saw that, but I didn't see him recommend an actual number. Can
> > someone recommend a number now? Tom initially recommended 10, but
> > Andrew's tests suggest something > 100. Tom didn't do any tests so I
> > tend to favor Andrew's suggestion, if he has one.
>
> In the OP, he suggested "on the order of 100". Maybe we could just go with 100.
OK, I will go with 100 unless I hear otherwise.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +