* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Having said all that, if we did try to fix it today, I'd imagine changing
> > TOAST value identifiers to int64 and inventing a new TOAST pointer format
> > for use when 32 bits isn't wide enough for the ID. But I think we're best
> > advised to hold off doing that until the need becomes pressing.
>
> Just out of curiosity, has anyone thought about inventing a new TOAST
> pointer format on the grounds that our TOAST pointers are unreasonably
> large?
I'd not thought about it, but sure sounds like a good idea from here.
Would be particularly great if we were able to do this and increase the
number of supported toast pointers and avoid having to go hunting for
unused identifiers due to wrapping.
Thanks!
Stephen